Treatment-resistant Bipolar Disorder
Results of a MEDLINE Search by
Ivan Goldberg, M.D.
1: J Clin Psychiatry 2002 Apr;63(4):275-83 Third generation anticonvulsants in bipolar disorder: a review of efficacy and summary of clinical recommendations. Yatham LN, Kusumakar V, Calabrese JR, Rao R, Scarrow G, Kroeker G. Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. yatham@interchange.ubc.ca BACKGROUND: To review the literature on efficacy of third generation anticonvulsants for treatment of bipolar disorder and provide clinical recommendations. METHOD: Open and controlled studies, case reports, and case series on the efficacy of lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, tiagabine, and zonisamide were located through electronic searches of several databases, by manual search of proceedings of international meetings, and through contacting authors of recent reports. RESULTS: Lamotrigine is the best studied anticonvulsant and has efficacy in acute bipolar depression and in longer term treatment of bipolar depression as well as rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder but not in acute mania. Open reports suggest usefulness of gabapentin as an adjunct in bipolar disorder, but double-blind trials failed to confirm efficacy in acute mania and treatment-resistant rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Topiramate is reported to be effective in acute mania and rapid-cycling bipolar disorder in several open studies, but methodological problems in a double-blind study led to a failed study in acute mania. However, topiramate may lead to weight loss in some patients. Zonisamide deserves further investigation, but tiagabine does not appear to be useful in acute mania. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine clearly fills an unmet need in treating bipolar depression and rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Other third generation anticonvulsants with the exception of tiagabine offer promise but require confirmation of their efficacy from double-blind studies. PMID: 12000201 [PubMed - in process] 2: Neuropsychobiology 2002;45 Suppl 1:33-6 Bupropion as add-on strategy in difficult-to-treat bipolar depressive patients. Erfurth A, Michael N, Stadtland C, Arolt V. Department of Psychiatry, Munster University Hospital, Germany. erfurth@uni-muenster.de Bupropion, a selective norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor, has been suggested for the treatment of bipolar depression, not only because of its efficacy, but also because of a probably lower risk of inducing switches to hypomania or mania. Most studies on bupropion treatment in bipolar patients have been performed in moderately ill out-patients. In contrast, we report on a sample of difficult-to-treat, predominantly severely ill, co-morbid, psychotic or therapy-refractory bipolar depressive in-patients. In this open and prospective study, 13 patients were treated with bupropion as an add-on strategy mainly to other antidepressants and to various mood stabilizers. Our data support the idea that bupropion is a first-line antidepressant in the treatment of severe bipolar depression. Eight of 13 patients showed a >50% reduction of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale ratings within 4 weeks. Co-medication with drugs commonly used in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder including venlafaxine, clozapine, lithium, topiramate and sodium valproate was safe in our small sample. While adhering to the suggestion of Goren and Levin not to exceed a daily dose of 450 mg of bupropion when treating bipolar depressed patients, we did not observe any switch from depression to hypomania or mania. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 11893875 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 3: Neuropsychopharmacology 2001 Nov;25(5):713-28 Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant depression: efficacy, side effects, and predictors of outcome. Sackeim HA, Rush AJ, George MS, Marangell LB, Husain MM, Nahas Z, Johnson CR, Seidman S, Giller C, Haines S, Simpson RK Jr, Goodman RR. Department of Biological Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA. This open pilot study of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in 60 patients with treatment-resistant major depressive episodes (MDEs) aimed to: 1) define the response rate; 2) determine the profile of side effects; and, most importantly; 3) establish predictors of clinical outcome. Participants were outpatients with nonatypical, nonpsychotic, major depressive or bipolar disorder who had not responded to at least two medication trials from different antidepressant classes in the current MDE. While on stable medication regimens, the patients completed a baseline period followed by device implantation. A 2-week, single blind, recovery period (no stimulation) was followed by 10 weeks of VNS. Of 59 completers (one patient improved during the recovery period), the response rate was 30.5% for the primary HRSD(28) measure, 34.0% for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRAS), and 37.3% for the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Score (CGI-I of 1 or 2). The most common side effect was voice alteration or hoarseness, 55.0% (33/60), which was generally mild and related to output current intensity. History of treatment resistance was predictive of VNS outcome. Patients who had never received ECT (lifetime) were 3.9 times more likely to respond. Of the 13 patients who had not responded to more than seven adequate antidepressant trials in the current MDE, none responded, compared to 39.1% of the remaining 46 patients (p =.0057). Thus, VNS appears to be most effective in patients with low to moderate, but not extreme, antidepressant resistance. Evidence concerning VNS' long-term therapeutic benefits and tolerability will be critical in determining its role in treatment-resistant depression. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 11682255 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 4: J Clin Psychopharmacol 2001 Oct;21(5):469-73 Olanzapine as long-term adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Vieta E, Reinares M, Corbella B, Benabarre A, Gilaberte I, Colom F, Martinez-Aran A, Gasto C, Tohen M. Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain. evieta@clinic.ub.es The aim of this study was to estimate the long-term effectiveness of olanzapine as adjunctive therapy in patients with bipolar disorder who exhibited an inadequate response to mood stabilizers. Twenty-three Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) patients with bipolar I and II were assessed by means of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia and entered if they gave their consent to participate. All of them had experienced frequent relapses, residual subsyndromal symptoms, and inadequate responses to other drugs, such as lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine. While maintaining other drugs, they all received open-label, increasing doses of olanzapine, until achieving clinical response. Other drugs were maintained. The patients were assessed several consecutive times from baseline to the endpoint with the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale for use in bipolar illness. Records of recurrences, hospitalizations, and side effects were also collected. The last-observation-carried-forward analysis showed that there was a significant reduction of CGI scores after the introduction of olanzapine, either in manic symptoms (p = 0.0015), depressive symptoms (p = 0.0063), or global symptoms (p = 0.0003). The most frequent adverse events were somnolence (17%) and weight gain (13%). The mean dose of olanzapine at the end of the 43-week follow-up was 8.1 mg/day. Olanzapine may be a useful medication for the long-term adjunctive treatment of patients with bipolar disorder who exhibit a poor response to mood stabilizers, such as lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine. These results suggest mood-stablizing properties of olanzapine. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 11593070 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 5: Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2001 Oct;35(5):631-8 Are atypical antipsychotic drugs also atypical antidepressants? Parker G, Malhi G. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia. g.parker@unsw.edu.au OBJECTIVE: To report a case series and review the psychopharmacology of the neuroleptic drugs to suggest that the atypical antipsychotic drugs may have an antidepressant action, at least for those patients with the melancholic subtype. METHOD: We note the literature suggesting that the older (or typical) antipsychotic drugs were established as having antidepressant activity, describe an open study of some two dozen patients with a treatment-resistant melancholic depression, describe rapid resolution of depression and augmentation benefits associated with commencing an atypical antipsychotic drug in a percentage of subjects, and then review relevant psychopharmacological studies to consider whether there is a rationale for use of antipsychotic drugs to treat depression. RESULTS: Of some two dozen patients treated with an atypical antipsychotic drug, almost immediate improvement was noted in four patients, and evidence of augmentation benefit obtained in another three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Impressions from this case series are encouraging. However, as open clinical observational studies are problematic, controlled studies are required to establish whether the atypical antipsychotic drugs have a role in the management of certain expressions of depression, and, in particular, treatment-resistant melancholic depression. Publication Types: Review Review of Reported Cases PMID: 11551279 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 6: Pharmacopsychiatry 2001 Jul;34(4):137-41 Adjunctive dopamine agonists in treatment-resistant bipolar II depression: an open case series. Perugi G, Toni C, Ruffolo G, Frare F, Akiskal H. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy. gperugi@psico.med.unipi.it OBJECTIVE: Previous studies and case observations have suggested that dopamine agonists (DAAs) such as pramipexole (PPX) and ropinirole (RPN) might be effective for major depression, but their adjunctive use in treatment-resistant bipolar II depression has not yet been specifically addressed. METHOD: A chart review was conducted on 18 patients with a DSM-III-R bipolar NOS (Bipolar II) major depressive episode who were admitted to the day-hospital of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Pisa. DAAs were added to ongoing treatments with conventional antidepressants and mood stabilizers to which patients had no responded after a period of at least 8 weeks. Clinical state and adverse effects were assessed at each visit. Final improvement in CGI scores of 1 or 2 were considered as responders. RESULTS: Mean DAA trial duration was 17.6 (sd = 7.8, range 4-34) weeks, with a mean final dose of 1.23+/-0.32 mg/day (range, 0.75-1.50mg/day) for PPX, and 2.97+/-0.99mg/day (range, 1.50-5.00mg/day) for RPN. DAAs were well tolerated and did not show any negative interaction with concomitant psychotropic medications. Only one patient became worse (final CGI = 5), and had to interrupt PPX due to nausea, increased agitation and irritability. Eight patients (44.4%) were considered responders (4 with PPX and 4 with RPN): 5 showed marked improvement (CGI = 1), and 3 showed moderate improvement (CGI = 2); another 5 (27.8%) manifested a transient response not sustained up to the end. The initial and final scores of CGI severity scale for all patients (responders and non-responders combined) were, respectively, 5.33+/-0.7 and 3.94+/-1.3 (mean +/- S.D). The mean change according to the CCI severity scale was statistically significant (t=4.74. p < 0.0002). CONCLUSION: From the results, PPX and RPN appear to be well tolerated and potentially useful in the adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant bipolar II depression. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 11518474 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 7: J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62 Suppl 16:10-7 The definition and meaning of treatment-resistant depression. Sackeim HA. Department of Biological Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, NY 10032, USA. has1@columbia.edu Most patients treated for an episode of unipolar or bipolar major depression are treatment resistant in the sense that the majority do not achieve full remission with the first somatic or psychosocial treatment they receive. Little attention has been given to formalizing criteria for evaluating the nature and extent of treatment resistance, even though determining the adequacy and outcome of prior treatment trials is key in clinical decision making about subsequent treatment. Furthermore, determining the adequacy of prior treatment is essential since substantial evidence indicates that large numbers of depressed patients are undertreated, resulting in prolonged episodes and the appearance of "pseudoresistance." Adequacy of antidepressant treatment trials should be defined in terms of thresholds for the dosage and duration of medication, adherence, and clinical outcome. The Antidepressant Treatment History Form is presented as one method to formalize the evaluation of treatment adequacy and treatment resistance. Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 11480879 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 8: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2001 May 10;121(12):1473-7 Comment in: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 Jun 20;121(16):1954. [Lamotrigine in the treatment of mental disorders] [Article in Norwegian] Malt UF, Fladvad T. Seksjon for Nevropsykiatri, Psykosomatisk avdeling, Rikshospitalet, 0027 Oslo. ulrik.fredrik.malt@rikshospitalet.no BACKGROUND: Bipolar and other mood disorders often do not respond satisfactorily to lithium, valproate, carbamazepine or antidepressants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On the basis of six years of clinical experience with lamotrigine in the treatment of psychiatric disorders, supplemented by three case reports and a comprehensive literature review of empirical studies, we discuss the possible indications for lamotrigine in psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Lamotrigine seems to have a stronger antidepressant effect in bipolar 1 disorders than gabapentine, carbamazepine and valproate, but a weaker effect on manic symptomatology than the latter two. Lamotrigine may be of value in the treatment of bipolar 2 disorders in which chronic treatment resistant depression is often a complication, including rapid cycling and, in the unipolar version of rapid cycling, brief recurrent depression. We have also used to good effect the neuroprotective effects of lamotrigine in prophylactic treatment of neurodegenerative disorders (e.g. Huntington's chorea). INTERPRETATION: Lamotrigine is an anticonvulsant with an efficacy profile in psychiatric disorders different from those of valproate, carbamazepine and gabapentine. The drug represents an important supplement to the treatment options in chronic recurrent mood and neuropsychiatric disorders. PMID: 11449770 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 9: Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2001 May-Jun;29(3):148-52 [Effectiveness and safety of topiramate in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder] [Article in Spanish] Vieta E, Gilabert A, Rodriguez A, Garcia-Castrillon A, Luna MJ, Arrufat E, Garcia-Pares G. Programa de Trastornos Bipolares. Centro de la Stanley Foundation de Barcelona, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona. EVIETA@clinic.ub.es INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of topiramate as add-on therapy for treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. METHODS: Twenty-one DSM-IV bipolar patients, considered resistant to treatment with lithium, carbamazepine or valproate, gave informed consent to receive increasing doses of the novel anticonvulsant topiramate as adjunctive therapy for their manic (n= 9), depressive (n= 6), hypomanic (n= 3), mixed (n= 2) or schizoaffective manic (n= 1) symptoms. The dosage of other mood stabilizer drugs remained unchanged throughout the 6-week follow-up. Outcome measures included the YMRS, HDRS-17, and CGI scales. Fifteen out of 21 patients completed the 6-week follow-up. RESULTS: Six patients (40% of completers, 29% by intention-to-treat) were considered responders to topiramate (> 50% reduction in YMRS or HDRS-17 and a decrease of 2 points in CGI). The drug was less effective in intially depressed patients. Topiramate was well tolerated and only one patient discontinued due to side-effects. The most common adverse effect was paresthesia (n= 2). Ten patients experienced moderate weight loss during the follow-up. The mean topiramate dose at endpoint was 158 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that topiramate may be a useful therapy for bipolar disorders, with promising results even in the most treatment-refractory patients. Publication Types: Clinical Trial Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 11412488 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 10: Bull Menninger Clin 2001 Winter;65(1):26-40 Treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Gitlin MJ. Department of Psychiatry, UCLA School of Medicine, USA. Over the last few years, the number of potential pharmacotherapies for bipolar disorder has greatly expanded. Yet the database for virtually all these newer treatments consists of case reports and case series. Among these newer treatments, recently released anticonvulsants are most promising. Lamotrigine has already shown efficacy for treating bipolar depression, while gabapentin's efficacy has yet to be documented in a controlled study. Alone among its medication class, topiramate, another anticonvulsant, is associated with weight loss. Novel antipsychotics are effective in treating acute mania. With the exception of clozapine, their efficacy as true mood stabilizers is still unknown. Utilizing combinations of mood stabilizers is common and appropriate but demands knowledge of potential pharmacokinetic interactions. Other approaches for treatment resistant bipolar disorder include high-dose thyroid hormones, calcium channel blockers, electroconvulsive therapy, and omega-3 fatty acids. Finally, the efficacy of adjunctive psychosocial strategies is a topic of active investigation. Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 11280956 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 11: Bipolar Disord 2000 Sep;2(3 Pt 1):165-73 The use of nimodipine in the treatment of mood disorders. Goodnick PJ. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, FL 33136, USA. pgoodnick@aol.com Nimodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium entry blocker, has been shown to protect from neuronal damage due to ischemia by providing for increased postischemic perfusion. Further, it has also been demonstrated to have antiepileptic properties. These two properties--calcium channel blockade and anticonvulsant benefits have been applied with success to mood disorder treatment. Although found helpful nearly a decade ago for uncomplicated mania, nimodipine may have particular benefits for those diagnostic subclasses of bipolar disorder most resistant to therapy, e.g., ultra-rapid-cycling bipolars and brief recurrent depressions. Publication Types: News PMID: 11256683 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 12: Bipolar Disord 1999 Sep;1(1):42-53 Comment in: Bipolar Disord. 2001 Jun;3(3):161. Topiramate as add-on treatment for patients with bipolar mania. Chengappa KN, Rathore D, Levine J, Atzert R, Solai L, Parepally H, Levin H, Moffa N, Delaney J, Brar JS. Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15215-2593, USA. chengappakn@msx.upmc.edu OBJECTIVE: Anticonvulsant agents such as carbamazepine and valproate are alternatives to lithium in treating subjects with bipolar disorder. Topiramate (Topamax), a new antiepileptic agent, is a candidate drug for bipolar disorder. We evaluated topiramate as adjunctive treatment for bipolar patients. METHODS: Eighteen patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder [mania (n = 12), hypomania (n = 1), mixed episode (n = 5), and rapid cycling (n = 6)], and two subjects with schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, resistant to current mood-stabilizer treatment were initiated on topiramate, 25 mg/day, increasing by 25-50 mg every 3 7 days to a target dose between 100 and 300 mg/day, as other medications were held constant for 5 weeks. The Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D), and Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version Scale (CGI-BP) were used to rate subjects weekly. RESULTS: By 5 weeks, 12 (60%) subjects were responders, i.e., 50% reduction in the Y-MRS scores and a CGI of 'much' or 'very much improved'. Three subjects were 'minimally improved', four showed no change, and one was 'minimally worse'. Six subjects had parasthesia, three experienced fatigue, and two had 'word-finding' difficulties; in all cases, side effects were transient. All patients lost weight with a mean of 9.4 lb in 5 weeks, and a significant reduction in body mass index (BMI) occurred too. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate appears to have efficacy for the manic and mixed phases of bipolar illness. Other preliminary data suggest antidepressant efficacy too. Among obese bipolar subjects, the weight loss potential of topiramate may be beneficial. If controlled trials confirm these initial results, topiramate may be a significant addition to the available treatments for bipolar disorder. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 11256656 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 13: Bipolar Disord 2001 Feb;3(1):23-9 Ketoconazole in bipolar patients with depressive symptoms: a case series and literature review. Brown ES, Bobadilla L, Rush AJ. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75390-9070, USA. sherwood.brown@utsouthwestern.edu BACKGROUND: Data from several studies suggest that medications, such as ketoconazole, which lower cortisol levels, may be effective for major depressive disorder (MDD). As with MDD, the manic, depressive, and mixed phases of bipolar disorder are frequently associated with elevated cortisol levels. The literature on the use of cortisol-lowering strategies in mood disorders is reviewed, and a case series illustrating the use of ketoconazole in bipolar depression is presented. METHODS: For the review, the MEDLINE and PSYCHINFO databases were searched, as were the bibliographies of pertinent articles to find papers on the use of cortisol-lowering agents in patients with mood disorders. In our open-label case series (n = 6), ketoconazole (up to 800 mg/day) as an add-on therapy was given to patients with treatment-resistant or intolerant bipolar I or II disorders with current symptoms of depression. RESULTS: Several case reports and small open studies suggest that cortisol-lowering agents may be useful for patients with depression. Two recent placebo-controlled trials of ketoconazole on patients with MDD report conflicting results. In our case series, all three patients who received a dose of at least 400 mg/day had substantial reductions in depressive symptoms. None had significant increases in mania. However, cortisol levels were not lowered in any of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The literature suggests that cortisol-lowering medications may be effective for a subset of depressed patients. Our preliminary findings suggest that ketoconazole may be useful in some patients with bipolar depression. Larger clinical trials are needed to confirm our observations. Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 11256460 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 14: J Affect Disord 2001 Mar;63(1-3):1-15 Convulsive therapy: a review of the first 55 years. Fink M. Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, Glen Oaks, Long Island, NY 11004, USA. mafink@attglobal.net Convulsive therapy was introduced to psychiatric practice in 1934. It was widely hailed as an effective treatment for schizophrenia and quickly recognized as equally effective for the affective disorders. Like other somatic treatments, it was replaced by psychotropic drugs introduced in the 1950s and 1960s. But two decades later, ECT was recalled to treat pharmacotherapy-resistant cases. Avid searches to optimize seizure induction and treatment courses, to reduce risks and fears, to broaden the indications for its use, and to understand its mechanism of action followed. Unlike other medical treatments, however, these searches were severely impeded by a vigorous antipsychiatry movement among the public and within the profession. ECT is effective in the treatment of patients with major depression, delusional depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, catatonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and parkinsonism, and this breadth of action is both remarkable and unique. ECT is a safe treatment. No age or systemic condition bars its use. Its major limitations are the high relapse rates and the occasional profound effects on memory and recall that mar its success. Experiments to sustain its benefits with medications and with continuation ECT are underway. Its mode of action remains a mystery and this puzzle is an unappreciated challenge. The full impact of this intervention is yet to be felt. Publication Types: Historical Article PMID: 11246075 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 15: Biol Psychiatry 2000 Sep 15;48(6):558-72 Bipolar depression: pharmacotherapy and related therapeutic strategies. Thase ME, Sachs GS. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. The depressed phase of bipolar affective disorder is a significant cause of suffering, disability, and mortality and represents a major challenge to treating clinicians. This article first briefly reviews the phenomenology and clinical correlates of bipolar depression and then focuses on the major pharmacological treatment options. We strongly recommend use of mood stabilizers as the first-line treatment for the type I form of bipolar depression, largely because longer-term preventative therapy with these agents almost certainly will be indicated. Depressive episodes that do not respond to lithium, divalproex, or another mood stabilizer, or episodes that "breakthrough" despite preventive treatment, often warrant treatment with an antidepressant or electroconvulsive therapy. The necessity of mood stabilizers in the type II form of bipolar depression is less certain, aside from the rapid cycling presentation. Both experts and practicing clinicians recommend bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as coequal initial choices, with venlafaxine and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, such as tranylcypromine, preferred for more resistant cases. The risk of antidepressant-induced hypomania or mania with concomitant mood stabilizer therapy is low, on the order of 5% to 10% during acute phase therapy. Additional therapeutic options and optimal durations of therapy also are discussed. Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 11018227 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 16: Am J Psychiatry 2000 Aug;157(8):1341 Quetiapine for treatment-resistant mania. Dunayevich E, Strakowski SM. Publication Types: Letter PMID: 10910805 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 17: J ECT 2000 Jun;16(2):204-7 Combined ECT and clozapine in treatment-resistant mania. Chanpattana W. Department of Psychiatry, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand. A treatment-resistant manic patient failed to respond to conventional treatment, adjunctive olanzapine (20 mg/day), clozapine (600 mg/day), or ECT alone, but did respond to ECT combined with low dose clozapine (200 mg/day). Maintenance ECT combined with clozapine resulted in a remission over the 18-month period. PMID: 10868331 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 18: J Psychiatry Neurosci 2000 May;25(3):276-80 Diltiazem as augmentation therapy in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder: a retrospective study. Silverstone PH, Birkett L. Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of a slow-release formulation of diltiazem as adjunctive therapy in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENTS: Eight female patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were administered diltiazem and monitored for a 6-month period before starting diltiazem and a 6-month period after starting the drug. OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients were seen at least monthly and usually every 2 weeks. The frequency and severity of both depressive and manic episodes were examined during the 6-month period after starting diltiazem, and compared with those during the 6-month period before diltiazem treatment. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in the frequency and severity of both manic and depressive episodes in these patients after they started treatment with diltiazem, compared with the period before they started treatment with diltiazem (p < 0.001). There was no evidence of side effects requiring patient withdrawal or of drug interactions. CONCLUSIONS: The results support previous suggestions that calcium-channel antagonists may be an effective adjunctive treatment in the management of bipolar disorder. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to confirm this small, open-label, retrospective study. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 10863888 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 19: J Affect Disord 2000 Jan-Mar;57(1-3):249-53 Mexiletine in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Schaffer A, Levitt AJ, Joffe RT. Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room FG46, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mexiletine, a medication with antiarrhythmic, anticonvulsant and analgesic properties, in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder patients. METHODS: Twenty subjects with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder who had failed to respond or were intolerant to lithium, valproic acid and carbamazepine were entered into the 6-week, open label study. Subjects were followed on a weekly basis for dosing of mexiletine, blood levels, and completion of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Manic State Rating Scale (MSRS). "Burden of Mood Symptoms" (BMS) was calculated by combining scores for the HAM-D and MSRS. RESULTS: Thirteen subjects (10 female, 3 male), mean age 41 years (S.D.=7.6), and mean duration of illness 20 years (S.D.=7.7) completed the study. The dose range of mexiletine was 200-1200 mg/day. Full response (>/=50% reduction in BMS) was seen in 46% of the subjects, and a partial response (25-49% reduction in BMS) in 15%. Of note, 5/5 subjects with a mixed or manic state demonstrated a full or partial response. LIMITATIONS: This study has an open label design, and a small number of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Mexiletine may be effective and safe in patients with highly treatment-resistant, chronic bipolar disorder. Randomized, controlled trials are required to confirm the current results. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 10708839 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 20: Clin Neuropharmacol 2000 Jan-Feb;23(1):14-6 Combined electroconvulsive-clozapine therapy. Kupchik M, Spivak B, Mester R, Reznik I, Gonen N, Weizman A, Kotler M. Ness Ziona Mental Health Center, Israel. We reviewed 36 reported psychiatric patients who were treated with a combination of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and clozapine. The indication of the ECT-clozapine treatment was resistance to classical antipsychotic agents, clozapine, or ECT alone. Sixty-seven percent of the patients benefited from the combined treatment. In most of the patients, the combined treatment was safe and well tolerated. Adverse reactions occurred in 16.6% of the patients and included prolonged ECT-induced seizures (one case), supraventricular (one case) and sinus tachycardia, and blood pressure elevation. It seems that combined ECT-clozapine treatment is effective and safe. This strategy may be a therapeutic option in treatment-resistant patients. Publication Types: Meta-Analysis PMID: 10682225 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 21: Psychiatr Clin North Am 1999 Sep;22(3):585-607 Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. An overview of research and clinical experience. Kilzieh N, Akiskal HS. VA Puget Sound Health Care Services, Tacoma, Washington, USA. Although many studies of RCBD have been reported over the last 2 decades, knowledge remains limited. Higher incidence in women is the sole clearly replicated finding in most studies. This finding might be mediated by cyclothymia, a temperament that is of higher prevalence in women and that might be considered as a normal variant of RC. Many questions remain unanswered. Review of putative risk factors, such as hypothyroidism and treatment with antidepressants, provides no conclusive answers. There is clinical evidence to implicate both factors. In principle, the thyroid connection can be approached rationally, yet there seems to be no relationship between thyroid status and response to thyroid augmentation. For this reason and given the potential risks of long-term thyroid use, this strategy should not be the first one to be tried in RC. Cumulatively, naturalistic studies over the past 30 years have strongly implicated antidepressants in switching and cycle acceleration, yet the double-blind, controlled, prospective studies that are needed to provide definitive answers are unlikely to be conducted for ethical reasons discussed in this article. Bipolar family history of RC probands appears indistinguishable from non-RC probands, indicating that most likely RCBD does not breed true. Although RC seems to be more lithium resistant with less likelihood of being symptom-free after 2 to 5 years of follow-up, many of these patients nonetheless have resolution of the RC course. There is no marked difference in suicide rates. An association of RC with bipolar type II, D-M-I pattern and those who switch into mania or hypomania on antidepressants is a provocative possibility: Antidepressants might introduce RC by first inducing a switch during a depressive episode, creating a D-M-I pattern, a pattern that is poorly responsive to lithium, which eventually degenerates into RC. Again, this sequence might be mediated by the high prevalence of cyclothymia in bipolar II patients. Thus, data from phenomenology, family history, and long-term outcome do not support RC as a separate entity. RC appears to be a temporary complicated phase in the illness, not a stable feature. This was noted by Kraepelin: I think I am convinced that that kind of classification must of necessity wreck on the irregularity of the disease. The kind and duration of the attacks and the intervals by no means remain the same in the individual case but may frequently change, so that the case must be reckoned always to new forms. Data by Gottschalk et al testify to the chaotic mood swings of contemporary bipolar disorder. Moreover RC is seen in other medical diseases, such as epilepsy, in which patients have phases of increase in frequency of episodes (seizures) that become refractory to treatment. Further longitudinal prospective studies are required to understand the complexity of this intriguing phenomenon and to provide better treatments. Algorithms deriving from tertiary research or university-based clinical experience may not generalize to RC or otherwise treatment-resistant bipolar patients seen in more routine practice. Illness severity in RCBD generally precludes double-blind controlled investigations. Meanwhile, clinicians may rely on discontinuing antidepressants, maintaining patients on combined mood stabilizers--of which valproate is probably the most useful--and making judicious use of atypical neuroleptics. Benzodiazepines and alcohol (which produce withdrawal), caffeine, stimulants, exposure to bright light, and sleep deprivation during excited phases should be avoided. Thyroid and nimodipine augmentation can be considered in those with the most malignant course. These are patients who need the maximal support that their psychiatrist can provide them. Office visits must be arranged as the last appointment of the day. Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 10550857 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 22: Acta Med Austriaca 1999;26(4):129-31 [Administration of thyroid hormones in therapy of psychiatric illnesses] [Article in German] Weissel M. Universitatsklinik fur Innere Medizin III, Wien. Michael.Weissel@akh-wien.ac.at This review tries to give the state of the art of the therapeutic use of thyroid hormones in psychiatric disorders, mainly in depression. Four hypotheses suggest an effect in these ailments: 1) a local relative T4 excess present (or better postulated to be present) in the brain of depressed patients is lowered by triiodothyronine (T3), by lowering serum levels of thyroxine (T4), 2) the effect of a depression-mediated cerebral lack of catecholamines is compensated by the T3/T4 induced activation of beta-receptors, 3) a postulated depression-induced local cerebral hypothyroidism can be counteracted by T3 and T4. 4) thyroid hormones increase the cerebral content of serotonin. This may be beneficial in depression, where shortage of serotonin in the brain is accused to be etiologically important. Thyroid hormones have been used so far in the following ways: 1) as T3 monotherapy in depression; 2) initial additive T3 for acceleration of the response to treatment with tricyclic antidepressants (TCA); 3) additive T3 for augmentation of the response to TCA in therapy-resistant patients with depression, 4) as high-dose (250-500 micrograms/die) T4-treatment of "rapid cycling bipolar disorder". Low dose (5-50 mg/die) T3 "augmentation therapy" is the best documented form of treatment with thyroid hormones in depression. The results suggest a convincing benefit for a varying percentage of non responders to therapy with TCA. For the other forms of treatment placebo-controlled double blind studies are not yet available or give conflicting results. Publication Types: Review Review Literature PMID: 10526631 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 23: Pharmacopsychiatry 1999 Jul;32(4):136-41 Clinical experience using adjunctive gabapentin in treatment-resistant bipolar mixed states. Perugi G, Toni C, Ruffolo G, Sartini S, Simonini E, Akiskal H. Institute of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy. gperugi@psico.med.unipi.it OBJECTIVE: Open studies and case observations have suggested that gabapentin may be effective in the treatment of bipolar disorder. However, the adjunctive use of the drug in bipolar mixed states has not been specifically addressed before. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with bipolar I mixed episodes as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Revised) (DSM-III-R), who were admitted to the outpatient department at the Psychiatry Clinic of the University of Pisa, were treated adjunctively with gabapentin for a period of eight weeks. All patients had been resistant to therapeutic levels of standard mood stabilizers, and had a mean clinical global impression (CGI) of 5.2+/-0.8 when entering the study. Gabapentin treatment was started at 300 mg/day and increased up to 2000 mg/day. Patients were evaluated using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and CGI. Patients with final CGI scores of 1 or 2 were regarded as responders. RESULTS: Only one patient had to interrupt the drug treatment, due to irritability and ataxia. Negative interactions between gabapentin and concomitant psychotropic medications were not observed. The condition deteriorated in only one patient (final CGI = 5). Ten patients were regarded as responders: four showed marked improvement (CGI = 1), and six had moderate improvement (CGI = 2). The mean dose of gabapentin at week 8 was 1130 mg (range 600-2000 mg). The mean final CGI score for all patients (responders and nonresponders combined) was 3.7+/-1.1 (the mean change in CGI was significant, t=6.1, P<0001). The reduction in the mania score was minimal and statistically insignificant. However, the mean HRSD score showed a statistically significant reduction from 18.2 to 10.6 (t=5.73, P<0.0001), irrespective of the baseline severity of the mania. All but one of the responders maintained these therapeutic improvements over 4-12 months, in most cases requiring less concomitant antidepressant and neuroleptic medications. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that gabapentin appears to be potentially useful in the adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant bipolar mixed states, and that it was particularly effective in relation to depressive symptomatology. Publication Types: Clinical Trial Review Review Literature PMID: 10505483 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 24: Ann Clin Psychiatry 1999 Sep;11(3):137-40 Erratum in: Ann Clin Psychiatry 2000 Mar;12(1):63 The use of quetiapine for treatment-resistant bipolar disorder: a case series. Ghaemi SN, Katzow JJ. Massachusetts General Hospital, Consolidated Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA. OBJECTIVE: To determine if quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic agent approved for the treatment of schizophrenia, is effective in the treatment of bipolar disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified six patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder, type I, who received open uncontrolled treatment with quetiapine in the setting of nonresponse or intolerance to traditional mood-stabilizing treatments. Treatment response was based on moderate to marked improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) scale. RESULTS: Two of six patients showed evidence of response. The main side effect noted was sedation. CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine may be a useful treatment for some patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Further studies are needed to assess quetiapine's effect more rigorously. PMID: 10482123 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 25: Am J Psychiatry 1999 Aug;156(8):1164-9 Clinical outcome in a randomized 1-year trial of clozapine versus treatment as usual for patients with treatment-resistant illness and a history of mania. Suppes T, Webb A, Paul B, Carmody T, Kraemer H, Rush AJ. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9070, USA. OBJECTIVE: Case series and follow-up studies suggest that clozapine may have mood-stabilizing properties in addition to antipsychotic action in patients with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and bipolar I disorder, but the generalizability of these findings is limited. This article describes a randomized, open study of clozapine add-on therapy versus treatment as usual for patients with treatment-resistant illness and a history of mania. METHOD: Thirty-eight patients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for schizoaffective or bipolar disorder that was deemed treatment-resistant were randomly assigned to clozapine add-on treatment (N = 19) or treatment as usual (no clozapine) (N = 19) and followed up for 1 year. Patients received monthly ratings on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression scale, Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, and a 40-item side effect checklist. Differences between treatment groups were assessed according to a pattern-mix random-regression model. An additional analysis compared group differences in rating scale scores against relative time in the study. RESULTS: Significant between-group differences were found in scores on all rating scales except the Hamilton depression scale. Total medication use over 1 year significantly decreased in the clozapine group. No significant differences between groups in somatic complaints were noted. The subjects with nonpsychotic bipolar I disorder who received clozapine showed a degree of improvement similar to that of the entire clozapine-treated group. Clozapine dose was significantly higher for the patients with schizoaffective illness than for those with bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support clozapine's independent mood-stabilizing property. They demonstrate that clozapine use was associated with significant clinical improvement relative to treatment as usual. Publication Types: Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial PMID: 10450255 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 26: Biol Psychiatry 1999 Apr 15;45(8):959-64 Donepezil in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Burt T, Sachs GS, Demopulos C. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA. BACKGROUND: A considerable percentage of patients with bipolar disorder do not respond or do not tolerate conventional treatment. Cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors have been suggested to possess depressogenic and antimanic properties. METHODS: We report a case series of treatment-resistant bipolar patients (n = 11) to whom we administered the ChE inhibitor donepezil. Four patients met criteria for current manic episode, 5 for mixed episode, 1 for hypomanic episode, and 1 for major depressive episode. Donepezil was added to current medication on an openlabel basis. Ratings were based on a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients, 6 (54.5%) demonstrated marked improvement (improvement in CGI-S > or = 2), 3 (27.2%) demonstrated slight improvement, 1 did not respond, and 1 did not tolerate the medication. Among those patients who had marked improvement (i.e., responders, n = 6), improvement was observed within 2 weeks or less in 5 of them (83%). Patients experienced only minor side effects. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest the efficacy and safety of donepezil in the treatment of bipolar disorder. To our knowledge this is the first published report on the use of donepezil in the treatment of mood disorders. Controlled, randomized, double-blind studies are necessary to validate these preliminary observations. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 10386177 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 27: Nervenarzt 1998 Nov;69(11):1019-22 [High dosage thyroxine treatment in therapy and prevention refractory patients with affective psychoses] [Article in German] Bauer M, Hellweg R, Baumgartner A. Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitatsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Freie Universitat Berlin. The following review summarizes current knowledge on the treatment of therapy-resistant patients with affective disorders with supraphysiological doses of thyroxine (T4). Several groups have reported independently of each other that administration of 200-500 micrograms T4/day has excellent effects in 50-65% of patients a) with bipolar disorder, with or without, "rapid cycling" course, who were previously resistant to all prophylactic drugs and b) in the treatment of therapy-resistant depression. T4 is effective only in combination with an antidepressant or a prophylactic drug. Side effects are minimal, even when T4 is administered over several years. These results now justify to recommend high dose T4-augmentation as "last-resort" treatment also beyond research purposes, i.e. in psychiatric wards and in private practice. Recommendations for clinical applications are given and hypotheses on possible mechanisms underlying the efficacy of T4 treatment are discussed. Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 9859125 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 28: J Affect Disord 1998 Jun;49(3):229-33 Clinical experience using gabapentin adjunctively in patients with a history of mania or hypomania. Knoll J, Stegman K, Suppes T. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, USA. BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant proposed to have mood-stabilizing properties. It has been effective in the add-on treatment of refractory partial seizures and secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. It has the advantage of a favorable side effect profile and lack of drug interactions. METHODS: Twelve consecutive outpatients with persistent, treatment-resistant bipolar spectrum disorders were treated with gabapentin in combination with other medications. Patients were started at 300 mg/day, which was titrated according to clinical response. Response was assessed every 3-4 weeks with a Clinical Global Improvement Scale. Dosage and side effects were noted. The median peak dose was 2400 mg/day. RESULTS: One patient had a marked response to gabapentin; seven, a moderate response; two, mild; and two, no response to treatment. Six patients discontinued treatment due to somatic complaints (i.e., sedation or fatigue). The most frequently reported adverse effect was sedation. LIMITATIONS: Gabapentin was added openly, and rating was nonblind in this case series. The use of concomitant medications could have increased the amount of sedation experienced with gabapentin. CONCLUSION: Overall, gabapentin was associated with moderate improvement of mood symptoms. Given the severity and chronicity of these patients' illness, a moderate response must be considered a relative success. Controlled studies of gabapentin are needed to clarify its role in the treatment of bipolar disorder. PMID: 9629953 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 29: Clin Neuropharmacol 1998 Jan-Feb;21(1):65-7 Lamotrigine in the treatment of resistant bipolar disorder. Kotler M, Matar MA. Ministry of Health Mental Health Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, Israel. Antiepileptic drugs, such as carbamazepine and sodium valproate, are integral to psychopharmacologic therapy over the last decades. Lamotrigine is a new antiepileptic drug that acts on amino acid neurotransmitters/neuromodulators, most prominently, glutamine, which has been reported to have potential mood-stabilizing effects. The reports on this effect are limited and sparse, and systematic investigations have not been published. Here we present two clinical cases representing atypical patient groups in which lamotrigine was successfully used as an add-on therapy for resistant bipolar depression. PMID: 9579289 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 30: J Affect Disord 1998 Jan;47(1-3):201-5 Divalproate augmentation in lithium-resistant rapid cycling mania in four geriatric patients. Schneider AL, Wilcox CS. Pharmacology Research Institute, Northridge, CA 91324-4625, USA. pri@lainet.com This report describes four geriatric patients, with rapid cycling bipolar disorder, who were treated successfully with divalproex sodium in combination with lithium carbonate, noting that both drugs were necessary for clinical remission of symptoms. Divalproex sodium may actually enhance the sensitivity to lithium carbonate in this population, potentially leading to treatment with lower lithium concentrations. This strategy has an advantage in enabling a greater safety range in the use of lithium carbonate in elderly patients. This report further raises questions as to the nature of rapid cycling illness in the "old-old" population. PMID: 9476762 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 31: Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1997 Jun;31(3):424-6 Clozapine in the management of bipolar and schizoaffective manic episodes resistant to standard treatment. Mahmood T, Devlin M, Silverstone T. Department of Psychological Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of clozapine in treatment-resistant manic episodes. CLINICAL PICTURE: Three cases, two with bipolar disorder (manic) and one of schizoaffective disorder (manic), were treated with clozapine. TREATMENT: Clozapine was used after the failure of standard antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. OUTCOME: All three cases were successfully treated. CONCLUSION: A controlled trial of clozapine in treatment-resistant bipolar and schizoaffective manic episodes is indicated. PMID: 9226089 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 32: J Clin Psychopharmacol 1997 Jun;17(3):185-9 The anticonvulsant lamotrigine in treatment-resistant manic-depressive illness. Sporn J, Sachs G. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. spornj@A1.mgh.harvard.edu Anticonvulsants are used extensively in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Treating depression in bipolar disorder can be difficult because of the limited antidepressant effects of the standard mood stabilizers and the tendency of antidepressants to induce mania or decrease cycle length. Lamotrigine is a new anticonvulsant with few side effects that may have mood-stabilizing and elevating effects. Its mechanism of action probably involves the inhibition of excessive release of excitatory amino acids such as glutamate. Antiglutamatergic agents may be antidepressant and mood stabilizing. A case series of 16 patients treated with lamotrigine (dose range 50 mg to 250 mg, mean dose of responders = 141 mg) is presented along with two case reports. All patients were considered treatment-resistant bipolar type I or II. Patients were rated on average 5 weeks after starting lamotrigine using a semistructured follow-up form that included symptom rating, Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores. Eight of 16 patients were rated as "responders" (CGI < or = 2) and had a mean increase of 16 in their GAF scores. Lamotrigine seems to have antidepressant and mood-stabilizing effects, but this requires confirmation in randomized, controlled trials. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 9169963 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 33: Psychiatr Clin North Am 1996 Jun;19(2):215-36 Treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Sachs GS. Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression require careful management, which takes into account the life-threatening potential of their depression and the risk of iatrogenic mania. Because there are few data specific to treatment of bipolar depression, much of the approach to bipolar depression is derived from experience with unipolar depression. There are, however, important differences between these two illnesses. Compared with patients with unipolar illness, patients with bipolar depression more likely experience antidepressant benefit from mood-stabilizing medication and, therefore, avoid the risks of antidepressant medication. Treatment of comorbid anxiety and substance abuse improves response. The risk of treating bipolar patients can be reduced but not avoided. Improved outcome may be achieved by careful assessment, prospective mood charting, and attempts to taper antidepressant medications after an appropriate continuation phase. Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 8827187 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 34: Am J Psychiatry 1996 Jun;153(6):759-64 Clozapine for treatment-refractory mania. Calabrese JR, Kimmel SE, Woyshville MJ, Rapport DJ, Faust CJ, Thompson PA, Meltzer HY. Mood Disorders Program, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of clozapine for treatment-resistant mania was examined in a prospective trial for patients with bipolar or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: The subjects were 25 acutely manic patients with either bipolar disorder (N = 10) or schizoaffective disorder-bipolar subtype (N = 15) for whom lithium, anticonvulsants, and neuroleptics had been ineffective, had produced intolerable side effects, or both. After a 7-day washout, the patients were treated with clozapine monotherapy. They were evaluated over 13 weeks with the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). RESULTS: Of the 25 patients, 18 (72%) exhibited marked improvement on the Young Mania Rating Scale, and eight (32%) exhibited marked improvement on the BPRS. The bipolar patients as compared to schizo-affective patients, and the nonrapid as compared to rapid cyclers, had significantly greater improvement in total BPRS score. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that clozapine is an effective therapy for treatment-resistant bipolar and schizoaffective mania. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 8633686 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 35: Psychopharmacol Bull 1996;32(1):55-61 Risperidone therapy in treatment refractory acute bipolar and schizoaffective mania. Sajatovic M, DiGiovanni SK, Bastani B, Hattab H, Ramirez LF. Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, OH-44141, USA. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of risperidone therapy in patients with bipolar I or schizoaffective mania who were treatment resistant or treatment intolerant. Patient psychopathology and involuntary movements were evaluated with a variety of scales, and risperidone was administered on an open-label basis. Five of six patients (all bipolar) discontinued risperidone therapy because of adverse drug effects (2 patients), lack of significant drug response and subjective clinical worsening (1 patient), or worsening of manic symptoms (2 patients). One patient with schizoaffective illness improved. Risperidone used without the addition of a mood stabilizer was ineffective in treating pure manic psychosis. In some vulnerable bipolar patients, risperidone monotherapy may have antidepressant activity that could exacerbate mania. If risperidone proves to have antidepressant activity, it may become an important agent in the therapy of patients with depressive symptoms and psychosis. PMID: 8927675 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 36: Can J Psychiatry 1995 Jun;40(5):270-4 A comparison of comorbid patterns in treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression. Sharma V, Mazmanian D, Persad E, Kueneman K. Mood Disorders Unit, London Psychiatric Hospital, Ontario. OBJECTIVE: To examine the occurrence of concomitant psychiatric disorders in patients with treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression. METHOD: Forty-nine patients participated as subjects. Twenty-four (49%) had unipolar depression and 25 (51%) had bipolar depression using DSM-III-R criteria. Structured clinical interviews were conducted with all patients. Chart reviews and interviews with family members were also carried out. Information relating to both current and lifetime diagnoses was obtained. RESULTS: Of the entire sample, 75.5% were found to have at least one other Axis I diagnosis and 46.9% had at least two additional Axis I diagnoses. The unipolar group had significantly more current comorbid diagnoses. When type of diagnoses was examined, unipolar patients had significantly more anxiety diagnoses at the time of the index episode, and over their entire lifetime. Bipolar patients had significantly more lifetime substance abuse diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Axis I comorbidity appears to be differentially associated with treatment resistance in unipolar and bipolar depression. PMID: 7553547 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 37: Biol Psychiatry 1995 Apr 15;37(8):553-9 Chronobiological approach for treatment-resistant rapid cycling affective disorders. Kusumi I, Ohmori T, Kohsaka M, Ito M, Honma H, Koyama T. Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. PMID: 7619980 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 38: J Clin Psychiatry 1994 Jul;55(7):295-300 Clozapine therapy in refractory affective disorders: polarity predicts response in long-term follow-up. Banov MD, Zarate CA Jr, Tohen M, Scialabba D, Wines JD Jr, Kolbrener M, Kim JW, Cole JO. Bipolar and Psychotic Disorders Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Mass. BACKGROUND: To determine the efficacy and tolerance of long-term clozapine therapy in refractory affective illness. METHOD: Hospital records were reviewed for 193 treatment-resistant patients with a discharge diagnosis of bipolar disorder (N = 52), schizoaffective disorder (N = 81), unipolar depression (N = 14), schizophrenia (N = 40), or other disorders (N = 6) started on clozapine therapy as inpatients at McLean Hospital. An independent "best-estimate" diagnosis, based on DSM-III-R criteria, was established for each patient. Patients were contacted at least 6 months after clozapine initiation for structured follow-up interviews by raters blind to diagnosis. Patients were stratified by diagnosis, and a variety of patient characteristics and outcome measures were compared. RESULTS: Subjects were followed up a mean of 18.7 months after clozapine initiation. Bipolar manic and schizoaffective bipolar subjects had significantly better outcomes than unipolar, bipolar, and schizoaffective depressed patients on a variety of measures. One or more episodes of depression prior to clozapine predicted clozapine discontinuation (p = .01). Affective and schizoaffective subjects had baseline measures of social functioning similar to that of the schizophrenics but had significantly greater improvement in scores at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Clozapine is an efficacious and well-tolerated therapy for refractory affective illness. Manic symptomatology predicts a more favorable response than depression. PMID: 8071290 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 39: Neuropsychopharmacology 1994 May;10(3):183-9 Treatment of intractable non-rapid cycling bipolar affective disorder with high-dose thyroxine: an open clinical trial. Baumgartner A, Bauer M, Hellweg R. Psychiatrische Klinik and Poliklinik, Universitatsklinikum Rudolf-Virchow (Charlottenburg), Free University of Berlin, Germany. Six patients with very severe forms of non-rapid cycling bipolar affective illness whose symptoms had previously been refractory to all current antidepressant and/or prophylactic medications were treated with supraphysiological doses of thyroxine (250 to 500 micrograms/day) as an adjuvant to their previous medications. The mean follow-up period was 27.8 +/- 12.8 months (range 12 to 46). The mean number of relapses during the follow-up period of each patient declined from 5.3 +/- 3.1 to 0.8 +/- 0.8 and the mean duration of hospitalization from 10.0 +/- 5.6 to 0.8 +/- 1.2 months as compared to the same length of time for each patient before the start of treatment with high-dose thyroxine (T4). Three of the patients had no further relapses at all. Thus, for these patients, who had previously been severely ill and therapy-resistant, high-dose T4 administration proved to have excellent effects on the course of the illness. However, in five of these patients the effect of the T4 was strong enough only when it was administered in combination with a prophylactic and antidepressant and/or neuroleptic drug, of which in some cases high doses were also needed. The side effects were negligible. Mechanisms that may possibly underlie the beneficial effects of high-dose T4 in bipolar affective disorder are discussed. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 7916915 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 40: Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993 Aug;88(2):121-3 Patterns of treatment resistance in bipolar affective disorder. Cole AJ, Scott J, Ferrier IN, Eccleston D. Department of Psychiatry, School of Neuroscience, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. The mean index episode length in 19 consecutive admissions with treatment-resistant bipolar affective disorder was 21.7 months. Four patterns of resistance were identified: rapid cycling (37%), other forms of cycling (32%), chronic depression (26%) and mixed states (6%). Female gender was significantly associated with rapid cycling. Other risk factors for treatment-resistant bipolar disorder, including a high prevalence of family history of affective disorder (72%) and electroencephalographic abnormalities (54% of recordings), were not confined to the rapid cycling group. PMID: 8213204 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 41: Can J Psychiatry 1993 Apr;38(3 Suppl 2):S57-61 Rapid cycling bipolar disorder and its treatment with valproate. Calabrese JR, Rapport DJ, Kimmel SE, Reece B, Woyshville MJ. Mood Disorders Program, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106. A large subgroup of lithium-resistant manic patients are rapid cyclers and as many as 82% of them exhibit poor responses to lithium. Thus, a substantial percentage of poor responses to lithium is accounted for on the basis of rapid cycling. Although controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of carbamazepine for the treatment of rapid cycling bipolar disorder, the response to carbamazepine frequently deteriorates. Furthermore, its ability to auto-induce and hetero-induce drug metabolism complicates its routine use. These findings suggest that substantial numbers of rapid cyclers do not respond to either carbamazepine or lithium and that additional mood stabilizers are needed. Our recent findings on 101 rapid cycling bipolar patients continue to support the impression that valproate has marked antimanic efficacy and poor to moderate antidepressant properties. Most patients with mixed states exhibited good antimixed state responses but then became depressed. Predictors of a good antimanic response included decreasing or stable episode frequencies and non psychotic mania. Predictors of a good antidepressant response were non psychotic mania worsening over the years of the illness and absence of borderline personality disorder comorbidity. These open prospective trials, as well as other positive reports of valproate's efficacy in bipolar rapid cycling, await replication with ongoing, controlled maintenance trials. Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial PMID: 8500080 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 42: Am J Psychiatry 1992 Feb;149(2):195-8 Treatment of imipramine-resistant recurrent depression, IV: A double-blind crossover study of tranylcypromine for anergic bipolar depression. Thase ME, Mallinger AG, McKnight D, Himmelhoch JM. Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. OBJECTIVE: Few trials of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) in tricyclic-resistant depression have had double-blind conditions. In the authors' previous double-blind comparison of tranylcypromine and imipramine in anergic bipolar depression, tranylcypromine was significantly more effective. This investigation was a crossover study of nonresponders in the initial study. METHOD: The subjects were 16 outpatients with anergic bipolar depression. Fourteen had not responded to 4 weeks of treatment with at least 30 mg/day of tranylcypromine or 150 mg/day of imipramine, and two patients were crossed over because of intolerable side effects from the initial drug. The crossover medication was prescribed as in the initial double-blind study. RESULTS: Twelve patients were crossed over from imipramine to tranylcypromine; nine of them responded to tranylcypromine. Highly significant improvements were documented on the Hamilton, Beck, and Pittsburgh Reversed Vegetative Symptom Scales. Four patients were switched from tranylcypromine to imipramine, but only one responded. CONCLUSIONS: The high rates of response to tranylcypromine in both the initial and crossover double-blind studies document the efficacy of MAOI treatment for anergic bipolar depression. Moreover, the results further illustrate the utility of MAOIs in tricyclic-resistant depressions. Publication Types: Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial PMID: 1734739 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 43: Br J Psychiatry 1990 Apr;156:560-4 Resistant bipolar disorder. Thomas IG, Oswald AG, Eagles JM. Royal Cornhill Hospital, Aberdeen. A 66-year-old farmer's wife had been admitted 31 times over eight years, suffering from manic depression. A variety of treatments for depressive episodes led to hypomania, and a case conference was held to discuss treatment. PMID: 2386867 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
